I recall the New Scientist magazine which created the furor over the Himalayas was among the untrustworthy "science news" magazines to regularly edit out any authentic criticism of the CO2 theory, and to censor comments by dissenting scientists on their website. Anyone who dared to question the CO2 theory had their comments routinely erased. I know because I was one of them. Philosophically, these scientistic cheaters are the same kind of people who burned Reich’s books, and then toasted each other after he was thrown in prison for daring to defend those same books.
World misled over Himalayan glacier meltdown
A WARNING that climate change will melt most of the Himalayan glaciers by 2035 is likely to be retracted after a series of scientific blunders by the United Nations body that issued it.
UN Retreats from alarmist claims:
UN climate chief admits mistake on Himalayan glaciers warning
The UN’s top climate change body has issued an unprecedented apology over its flawed prediction that Himalayan glaciers were likely to disappear by 2035.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said yesterday that the prediction in its landmark 2007 report was “poorly substantiated” and resulted from a lapse in standards. “In drafting the paragraph in question the clear and well-established standards of evidence, required by the IPCC procedures, were not applied properly,” the panel said. “The chair, vice-chair and co-chairs of the IPCC regret the poor application of IPCC procedures in this instance.”
Prepare for more of this back-peddling…
Met Office computer accused of ‘warm bias’ by BBC weatherman
A BBC weather forecaster has suggested that the Met Office’s super-computer has a ‘warm bias’ which has stopped it predicting bitterly cold spells like the one we have just endured.