Global Climate Deception! Brighter New Formula!

The Obamite Ministry of Truth has come up with a new term to sustain global hysteria (and the gravy-train) feeding what they once called "CO2-driven anthropogenic global warming".

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/16/white-house-global-warming-global-climate-disruption/?

It seems the old terms are not sufficiently scary anymore, so they have come up with newspeak terms they hope will set the matter straight, once and for all.

The new terminology is: Global Climate Disruption!

But in reality, it is more of the same old Global Climate Deception!

A review of basic scientific methods is in order:

The value and accuracy of a theory is most centrally determined by it’s ability to predict how things go, its ability to predict the future.

The "CO2 warming" or "Anthropogenic Global Warming" (AGW) theory was originally proposed around 50 years ago, alongside other theories such as the "new Ice Age", and bore no overtly deceptive connotations. That was a time when climatologists still modestly confessed they did not know everything, allowed open discussion on all sorts of ideas. There was still a commitment to truth, and fact. After c.1970, political activists swamped the universities, and there was a general trend of intolerance for any theory which went against the typically Marxist-Socialist agendas of the new activism. CO2-driven global warming seemed like a great idea to pound the heads of capitalist governments, which were already by then self-reforming on issues of air and water pollution, through the efforts of both conservatives and liberals in government. (Socialist nations, by contrast, became cesspools of intensive pollution and environmental destruction.) By around 1990, the UN also got into the "climate" business, even while failures of CO2-greenhouse global-warming theory became increasingly apparent. However, by then the political-activist juggernaut of "Global Warming" was on a roll, and wasn’t going to stop for any failures in its original premises.

"Top" climatologists pushing the warming theory by then had become heads of well-funded institutions, and became media celebrities where, in front of reporters and the public, they promoted overtly political agendas and condemned their critics as dangerous ignoramuses. Journal editors and department chairmen, always concerned about grant-money revenues and the political climate, increasingly required their faculty to teach the new warming catechism, which also appeared as dogma in textbooks, and new graduate students had to recite the correct global-warming prayers in order to graduate. All things related to weather catastrophe required expert commentary, and someone to blame also, even if weather science was very immature, and natural climate cycles could be identified.

So, how did the CO2 theory go? Did it predict the future, or not?

Where CO2-greenhouse theory predicted more hurricanes, eventually it became clear that fewer actually occurred. Where CO2 theory predicted non-stop global heating, only sporadic heating with cooler down-turns prevailed. The years between c.1940 to 1970 were cooling, and so have been the years following c.2000. Temperature data indicated the 1930s and the El-Nino year of 1998 were the hottest within the 20th Century, even while the UN IPCC was taken over by political operatives who pushed international tax scams and Climate Socialism, and promoted the fraudulent "hockey stick" graph. CO2 increases over millions of years always followed the ending of major Ice Ages by several hundred years, not preceding them as CO2 theory demanded, but no matter. Al Gore got a Nobel Prize for promoting a propaganda film composed of multiple falsehoods — but nearly everyone who pointed out the Emperor Has No Clothes was either ignored, silenced or ridiculed.

CO2-greenhouse theory also predicted a global net loss of polar ice cover, but ice-caps expanded in the Antarctic over the same time floating sea ice cover in the Arctic reduced. So there was no net loss of polar ice cover. And whereas CO2 theory demanded that no significant global warming exist prior to the industrial revolution, the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) always stood out as a gigantic contradiction, being even warmer than today, and yet without the predicted "eco-catastrophes". Polar bears, penguins, whales, etc., survived the MWP quite handily. Biologists were then being excluded from conferences and publishing when their data showed increases in polar bear and penguin populations… but, none of the "people who mattered" paid attention to such details. New knowledge about the Little Ice Age (LIA), which developed after the MWP and lasted all the way down to c.1800, indicated the present warming trend was in actuality our coming out of the chilly depths of the LIA. The "hocky stick" fraud neatly ironed out all the bumps and dips in the global climate record, however, and oh well they are also now erasing the MWP and LIA from textbooks and internet websites, busy little bees in the Ministry of Truth.

Not one of the central predictions of CO2-greenhouse/AGW theory came true!

But oh my how popular it all became. Hollywood, Big Media, grade-school teachers and everyone under the age of 12 became sudden experts on "global warming" and the forthcoming "end of the world" — hectoring parents and businessmen and farmers on their "carbon footprint", declaring how "climate deniers" (the guys in the rumpled suits, who still had some scientific integrity) were oh just like Hitler and so forth. Shut ’em up. Put ’em all in prison, yelled the socialist enviros, when they weren’t yelling "death to Israel".

Ergo, Voila, comes now the "New Improved CO2 theory", with fancy new packaging, like some new laundry detergent. "CO2" won’t even be mentioned anymore! Instead, "Global Climate Disruption" will now dazzlingly scrub clean all those prior predictive failures and dirty lies. They now will be able to predict warm or cold, wet or dry, violent or peaceful weather, drought or flood! No matter what happens, they’ve got it covered! Brighter and whiter! Scrub, scrub, erase, erase. Of course, this new theory cannot tell you where or when any of those weather catastrophes might occur, as it "predicts" both everything and nothing at the same time! So it is basically worthless as a theory, and that my friends is the hallmark of bad science, a theory which has no bearing upon how the real world actually functions.

This is all Scientific Methods 101. So is the principle, that bad scientific theory is invariably followed by social disasters.

James DeMeo, PhD

+++++

Meanwhile, and of much greater predictive significance for global weather and climate, mostly zero or only a few sunspots are typically occurring, when we should have over a hundred daily at this point in the cycle.
http://sohowww.nascom.nasa.gov/data/synoptic/sunspots_earth/mdi_sunspots.jpg

Also:

Surprise September Snow in Montana (today)
http://www.krtv.com/news/september-snow-surprise-in-montana/
Texans Fighting Back…
http://radio.woai.com/cc-common/news/sections/newsarticle.html?feed=119078&article=7606198

Related:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=92557

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=204185

One Response to “Global Climate Deception! Brighter New Formula!”

  1. carlos Says:

    Thank you for summarizing so courageously -and scientifically- well what has happened, is happening and will happen in terms of global climate. As you pointed out, what started as an honest scientific theory, because the ATMCO2 inducing climate change was at the beginning (up to mid 1970s) a decent scientifically proposed theory (which had to be put in the back burner once discoveries like that of svensmark happened), got so out of control that it became the basis for one of the biggest and best funded lies of our times: warming only, which, when it did stop happening so globally, had to be re-named (so that the gravy full of millions upon millions doesn´t dry up): “climate disruption.” Not that there is not the technology to cause “climate disruption” as there is and we know it. But, the “climate disruption” of the politicos -so aroused by big power and money- with their gruesomely pathetic “scientific” masks, has one objective in mind (with the very best intentions of course, when not): to be used as another convenient tool to take the whole world to a centralized planned economy and society with zero dissent (the latter pushed with such a craft that makes Goebbels look like propaganda 101 -without of course ever underestimating Nazi horror). In that agenda, and with their best intentions (and making sure that they protect the vested interests of their investors, such us Mr. Soros, who despises so much capitalism but from which he has made all his billions), they will impose on the individual here, there, anywhere, their very “open society” of “el buen vivir” which will be followed by the “buen decir”. That is, those gurus of this newest age, will tell us what is best for each of us, for all of us, and what is also best -to say and not to say-, for each of us and all of us…. Yes, soon the leaders of the ideology of “global climate disruption” will have the commissariats of how to live well, and the ones of what to say and not to say -perhaps among their to be imposed sayings will be that of Evo Morales, “planet or death”, always therefore explicity showing that sublimation of death so persistent in those machos who have such a little regard for life… they do not realize that the extremes that they push are what is pushing life away from this planet; they cannot realize that because they confuse, in their character armour, as Camus had it, character with power, thus ignore what is to be creative because their whole life is immersed in masturbating themselves with the excess of cracia(power)….

    In those conditions science -and the humane on earth- are in a deep coma these days, mi amigo. I respect therefore your valiant and profound way of trying to keep them, not just alive, but to attempt to give them like a jump start to wake them, wake us, up! The global climate commissars can say anything, can spent the billions, but their bad taste and ideology produce such ineffective actions that at some point they have to spit in their own faces…. Wishful thinking that of mine however, because, their aggression is not passive. It is very active, and most hypocritically at that, because it won´t do anything for instance agaisnt those like the nuclear Ayatollahs of Iran that keep on pushing and pushing an ideology based on the very anti-life ideology of Khomeini, for whom, “the natural world is the lowest element, the scum of the earth”….

    And yet not all is lost, because like that weed that breaks the pavement, we have guys like you and even little tiny countries that to survive, with all the defects that implies to be real, have the decency to be loyal to science and reason, thus stand with the means and perhaps already even the technology to make a true difference when the time comes -and the time is alredy here.

    Best to you and please keep up the great work -despite those commissars (and their blistfully blind followers), and the already grown up Basijis (not few of whom perhaps are now nuclear scientists), that, such “progressive” commissars should be denouncing up frontly (if they were consequent with what they preach) but tragicomically conveniently won´t….

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: