Global Chill Already Cometh?

Global Chill Already Cometh?

Intensive work at OBRL has prevented the usual commentary and postings. However, the recent tragedy of massive tornado strikes in the Midwest, with political speeches claiming this is the result of "global warming" deserves giving the matter some attention.

First, a nice blue-glowing cloud picture, details about which are also given below:

To continue, I have no idea what the devotees to the "CO2-Warming" theory of climate changes are saying — probably continuing with the same old mantra — but this last winter has been exceptionally cold for most of the Northern Hemisphere, with records broken as to bitter cold temps and massive snowfalls across Europe, Asia and Alaska.

For Example:

Cold Wave hits China, coldest in 30 years.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2012/12/22/Bitter-cold-snap-grips-China/UPI-40031356187955/
An internet search on "China Bitter Cold 2013" will bring up more of the same, indicating this was not just a one-time episode.

Moscow Cold, Snow, 50 year records broken.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/worldnews/9711789/Heavy-snow-in-Moscow-and-the-first-snowfall-of-the-season-in-Europe.html
An internet search on "Moscow cold snow records broken 2013" or "Russia…" will show more of the same. Here’s a few reports from April 2013:
http://english.ruvr.ru/2013_04_01/Moscow-struggles-with-record-snowfall/
http://iceagenow.info/2013/04/record-snowfall-moscow/

Alaska longest snow season on record, breaking a 30 year past record.
http://www.today.com/id/51929453/ns/local_news-anchorage_ak/t/anchorage-sets-record-longest-snow-season/

Europe also hit by record cold, snows:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/16feb_deepfreeze/

Darkest Winter (lack of sun due to incessant clouds, snow, rain) for Germany in 43 years.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/germany-weathers-darkest-winter-in-43-years-a-885608.html
Very nice blue-glowing clouds picture at this website, reproduced above.

Ooops we must correct that, it is the Darkest Winter ever recorded for Germany:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/winter-weather-plagues-germany-as-spring-begins-a-890166.html

OK, having said all that, it is true that "weather is not climate", even though climate is produced by the averaged aggregate of measured weather data. So what are the averages saying?

Finally the more scientifically inclined members of the "warming" community are admitting that something is not correct with their theories. As documented here:

Has Global Warming Come to a Halt?
http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/climatechange/has-global-warming-come-to-a-h-1/61445
Note the trends on this website: From 1950 to 1975 approx., no basic change in global temps. From 1980 to 1998, a warming trend. Then from 1998 to today, global temperatures have leveled off. Note the graph of El-Nino/La-Niña events, and how the peaks give rise to global changes. Likewise the small volcanic symbols, indicating sun-blocking dusts in the upper atmosphere. This particular website takes the "warmist" view, so even this begrudging admission is remarkable. Some of the weblinks on this page are rather outrageous in unscientific claim-making, rather like cheer-leaders for a football team, as if scientific conclusions needed cheer-leading to "win" — of course this is cheerleading for Billions in grant money, for "their side". Whatever happened to old-fashioned scientific investigation, and allowing the truth to fall where it may?

Here’s more, the British met office being a bit more reliable than the American NOAA or the cherry-picked "consensus" community of "scientists" whomever that is supposed to be. The last time the IPCC made such surveys, they included all kinds of leftist political hacks and "activists" from neo-Marxist environmental groups. "Climate Deniers" were of course excluded from such surveys.

Global Warming stopped 16 years ago, Met Office.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2261577/Global-warming-stopped-16-years-ago-Met-Office-report-reveals-MoS-got-right-warming–deniers-now.html
16 years ago was what? 1997-1998 The worst El Nino on record, highest global temps from that, but not from CO2 emissions.

Even the die-hard Leftist BBC finally admits, sort of, that well, maybe, POSSIBLY, their theory on warming isn’t panning out as it should:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-22567023

Then of course, the major radical-left politicians weigh in on the issue:

Team Obama calls global warming doubters ‘crazy’
http://washingtonexaminer.com/team-obama-calls-global-warming-doubters-crazy/article/2529291
Mygod, are we now supposed to bow to the King’s Hat? (If you don’t know what that means, then you really have been under-educated. Look it up.) Yeah, it is the global warming critics who are the untrustworthy people, not the political hacks in Washington DC.
http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/20/democratic-senator-goes-on-anti-gop-rant-over-climate-change-as-tornadoes-hit-oklahoma/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

And just in case you think the recent disastrous tornado outbreak has something to do with global warming, just go back a few decades and the same mainstreamers today pushing the "warming" scenario as the cause of weather catastrophes were then blaming "global cooling":

1975 : Tornado Outbreaks Blamed On Global Cooling
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/05/21/1975-tornado-outbreaks-blamed-on-global-cooling/

In fact, the Little Ice Age was a time of many weather disasters, globally failed crops, famines and epidemic diseases, wars and government collapse. Definitely not so good as the Medieval Warm Period, which was still warmer on average than anything we have experienced in the last 1000 years! The MWP was a time of excellent crops, economic boom, abundance and plenty, fewer wars, with extra money to finance voyages of exploration, massive architectural projects, works of art, and so on.

This modern "climate change" fascism would have you believe otherwise, and this means, well, just ignore all those reports given above. Erase them from your memory, even if you experienced such bitter cold. That kind of intellectual fascism as pushed by the "warmers" is playing out exactly as happened with government, industry and academic support for nuclear power reactors back in the same 1970s. No matter what the evidence, they KNEW nuclear power plants were "safe, cheap, efficient", etc., even though all evidence showed it was unsafe, expensive and inefficient. So dissenting professors were fired, academic journals censored papers revealing the dangers, Big Lies were told in Science and Nature and by all the political hacks and "journalists" in the newspapers and on TV. The dissenters were either silenced or pilloried, just as today are the dissenters to the CO2 theory of warming. It took the disasters of Three Mile Island, Chernobyl and Fukushima to keep the Atomic Power Vampire sealed in its crypt. What disasters will be necessary to put an end to the intensive planning for increased warming, when in fact we should be putting more attention to the cold side of things.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/elderhealth/9959856/Its-the-cold-not-global-warming-that-we-should-be-worried-about.html
We have yet another cold blast of winter headed into the Pacific Northwest just as I write this, in the latter part of May. Maybe a chilly brush, or a big dump of snow. Who can say? No clear idea what lays ahead, except that it won’t be like what is predicted out of Washington DC. Prepare accordingly.

James DeMeo, PhD

One Response to “Global Chill Already Cometh?”

  1. dusanmal Says:

    Correct conclusion but citations for irrelevant data. It is Climate question, not Weather question.
    Now to the most important relevant scientific evidence (typically ignored nowadays by climate hysterics):
    1) Does it really matter and is it extraordinary and dangerous if Earth is warming? Ice cores data point that Earth is indeed warming in the last 200 years. Warming from extreme colds. Despite 200 years of warming we are still in 10% COLDEST years for the last 10000 years. At least 100-200 years of more warming at the current rate would just bring us to an average warmth over the last 10000 years. Ice cores from Greenland and Antarctic data points to this. Available for testing and re-testing in many highly respected institutions. Above is from published and peer-reviewed articles. Independent support: Archeological – retreating Greenland ice recently uncovered large medieval farming communities of the size and scope Greenland can’t support nowadays, being too cold. It was much warmer in historical times and the warmest periods usually coincided with booming civilization advances (Minoans, Egyptians, Rome, Medieval boom,…). Cold periods (as now) typically correlate with troubles and warfare. Warming, if any, is good.
    2) But is it us/CO2 that is causing it? NASA/MIT 1990’s satellite study on global warming and potential greenhouse effect evidence through the precise measurements of incoming, absorbed and returned energy by the Earth. Results explicitly excludes greenhouse effect of any kind (this includes natural increase of CO2, human caused increase in CO2,… and ANY other greenhouse agent we know or even do not know about) as a cause of 1990’s Earth warming. Put in the high school level Physics: for almost a decade, while Earth was indeed warming proportion of the energy reflected back to the space by Earth to that incoming to Earth steadily increased. More energy reflected. Exact opposite of the greenhouse effect requirement that more energy is absorbed and less reflected. Excludes “human caused Earth warming through increase in human generated CO2”. Fundamentally.
    3) So what is warming /cooling the Earth? CERN study 0f 2011 (famous for the most shameful treatment of the Science, worse than what was done to Galileo and Copernicus, because that was done by Church incompatible with the Science; this was done by the ideological Scientists to the Science – explicit order that scientists can publish numbers of their results but NOT interpret them!): Strong correlation of how energy is delivered to the Earth from space to the warming/cooling of the Earth and explanation why: water vapor in atmosphere causes Earth to more efficiently heat up from high energy particles than from low energy ones. High school Physics level: if energy E is delivered to the Earth by 100 particles of energy E/100, Earth will be cooler than if energy E have been delivered by 10 particles of energy E/10. Traced by concentrations of element Be. Earth climate (as evidenced from ice core records) closely correlates to the proportion of high energy particles in the radiation Earth received at the time. Over last 250000 years of Antarctic ice core data this proportion holds perfectly well. Evidence of what really causes shifts in Earth climate. (And because the process is warming due to the more efficient energy usage (2) NASA/MIT result can be explained).
    After these fundamental data is know one can point that since early 2000’s Solar activity and hence high energy particles proportion has slowed and than dropped. Likely causing weather events mentioned in the article. But those are short term weather events, chaotic in nature and the global cooling may not be the only reason for them.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: