Archive for January, 2015

OBRL Newsletter #27, Year-End Summary and Review for 2014, Now Available

January 23, 2015

OBRL Newsletter #27
Year-End Summary and Review for 2014
from the Orgone Biophysical Research Lab (OBRL)

Now Available

You can obtain this Newsletter by going to the following weblink:


Topics include:

1. New Published Articles and Books:

2. Research Report: Update on Spectrographic Research at OBRL, Experimental Verification of Reich’s Findings on Orgonotic Lumination

3. Research Project: CORE: Western Drought Emergency

4. New Confirmations on Saharasia

5. Regrettable Confirmations of Saharasia: Muslim Terrorists Discover Saharasia.

6. Saharasia: Findings made more that 15 years before 911, still pertinent and essential

7. My recently published book, In Defense of Wilhelm Reich, with Book Review.

8. More slanders of Reich and myself, and my responses:

9. Additional essays of merit, on various issues

10. Complete list of James DeMeo’s research publications and books

You can obtain this Newsletter by going to the following weblink:

Also, our tardy, but very Best Wishes for the New Year 2015.

Breathe deep, fly high, and thrive!

James DeMeo

James DeMeo, PhD
Director , Orgone Biophysical Research Lab (OBRL)
Ashland, Oregon, USA

The OBRL News & Quarterly Newsletters:

Natural Energy Works, books and instruments
Ashland, Oregon, USA

* Please consider making a donation to the OBRL Research Fund, to assist the continuation of our on-going laboratory work, field-research, historical investigations and publications. Or, visit the weblink above to purchase our publications.

It has nothing to do with Islam

January 14, 2015

It has nothing to do with Islam
Oh, no, no, no…

Excellent quote from: "Learning from Islam…" by Henryk M. Broder
via Google translator

"Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, the Islamic State and the Taliban have nothing to do with Islam. The regime of the ayatollahs has nothing to do with Islam. The bloody battles between Shiites and Sunnis have nothing to do with Islam. If flogged in Saudi Arabia, blasphemers and adulterous women are stoned, that has nothing to do with Islam. The assassins of "9/11" had nothing to do with Islam. Also what happened in London, Madrid, Mumbai, Bali, Boston, Sydney, Brussels and Toulouse, had nothing to do with Islam. Because Islam means "peace" and jihad, we hear it again and again, does not mean "holy war", but "inner struggle" for whatever reason. In every religion there are fanatics, but in no other is so stubbornly insisted that they have nothing to do with the religion to which they refer.

The distinction between the good and the evil Islam-Islamism is considered soberly, as arbitrary as between socialism [theory] and the real existing socialism. It is now even further differentiated. There are also "moderate", "orthodox" and "fanatical" Islamists. But this nuance is that Islamism is not the opposite of Islam, but one of its varieties. It is strange that no one has come up with the idea to distinguish between capital and capitalism in order to save the honor of the capital, and to push [away the claimed] negative side effects of capitalism… "

New article on ether-drift experiments in Journal of Scientific Exploration

January 11, 2015

New article on ether-drift experiments in Journal of Scientific Exploration

James DeMeo: "Does a Cosmic Ether Exist? Evidence from Dayton Miller and Others" J. Scientific Exploration, 28(4): 647-682, 2014.

It will not be available for viewing unless you are a member of the Society for Scientific Exploration, or subscriber to their journal.

However, this article contains similar information to what I’ve previously published in other journals or books, and which are available for free download from my on-line websites (search them by keywords in your browser):

Also on-track for publication in late January:

James DeMeo: DAS ORGONAKKUMULATOR-HANDBUCH: Wilhelm Reichs Entdeckung der Lebensenergie. Rüstzeug für das 21. Jahrhundert zur Selbstheilung und allgemeinen Verbesserung der Lebensqualität, Mit vielen Bauanleitungen. All new German translation of The Orgone Accumulator Handbook, Third Revised Edition, Natural Energy Works, Ashland, OR, in Press, available in late January or early February 2015. Now available for pre-order, with free shipping internationally if you purchase direct from our on-line shopping cart:
(enter "OBRL News Free Shipping Offer" in comments when you check out, and shipping charges will be deducted.)


"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
– George Orwell

Follow-Up: Winston Churchill and Islam, and the Paris (and Nigerian) massacres

January 9, 2015

Follow-Up: Winston Churchill and Islam, and the Paris (and Nigerian) massacres

I’ll start this essay with a small correction to my prior item on Churchill.

I made reference to the German word Gleichschaltung, which was misspelled, but is correct as given here. To elaborate, this is an interesting concept, applied by the Nazis in every small and large ways, to gradually change social groups and institutions with new rules and laws in support of Nazi goals and agendas. In so doing, it eventually became nearly impossible for anyone critical of Nazism to gain even a bit of "wiggle room", by which to oppose or to live freely in opposition to those agendas. The German communists had a similar term, Einheitsfront, first used in the early 1920s, as an ideological tool among Marxists for unified goals and policy agendas, across all social groups and institutions, running in a singular direction favoring Communism, to erase all opposition to their agendas. It was instituted after their first efforts of communists to make a violent take-over in Germany, and became a method of enforcing Comintern policy.

In both cases, of Nazism and Communism, these policy terms were aimed at making subtle influences across diverse social groups and networks which were not ordinarily under their controls. Overall, it is yet another point of agreement between the hard-leftists and the hard-rightists — though today, after the WW2 defeat of Nazi power, we have few Nazis lurking around, but many, many Communists, frequently ignorant liberals who have gone over to Communist sentiments without even knowing it.

While this may seem like ancient history, in fact today the radical leftist factions continue with applications of the Einheitsfront policies, under other names. Critics have often described this as "Cultural Marxism" with some legitimacy, even while that term is often abused by authentically right-wing people. But Cultural Marxism exists, nevertheless, and a similar ideological process is at work in what is now termed, by critics, as the Islamization of Europe and America, something that is also supported by the Marxist Left. A new form of Leftist-Islamic Brownshirt movement has also developed in Europe, which self-describes as the "anti-fa" or "anti-fascist" movement, which is fully allied with Islamic factions aiming for an end to Western democracy and freedoms.

Which brings us to the current situation.

By now, unless you have been joyfully unplugged from international news, you will know about the latest Islamic atrocity in France, the murder of 12 workers and cartoonists at the Charlie Hebdo (Charlie Weekly) magazine, who "offended" Muslims so badly they just had go and kill them.

Related, a young female police officer was machine-gunned by a Muslim wearing a bullet-proof vest, carrying an AK-47. In another part of Paris shortly afterwards. Just for good measure.

Then even more recent, news that some 2000 men, women and children were massacred by Boko Harem in the Nigerian town of Baga, which is now entirely burned to the ground, with dead bodies laying all over the place. It was a massive Islamic jihad slaughter, all too similar to what’s been going on over centuries wherever the "Religion of Peace" decides to invade in force! Boko Harem means — "People Committed to the Prophet’s Teachings for Propagation and Jihad"

The mainstream leftist press has been having a field day, denying that any of this has anything to do with "real Islam", which is "a religion of peace" — an assertion which is today so absurd that even liberals have a hard time believing it.

Maybe the NY Times, President Obama and other left-apologists for Islamic genocide will explain to us how so many massacres can be committed by fanatics screaming "Allahu Akbar", and often later waving a Koran at the videocam for a YouTube justification, but they are all misunderstanding the words of Muhammed. Islamic State also, their massacres, mass-rapes and enslavement of women by the thousands, is that also a misunderstanding of the "real" Islam?

Of course, these mass-murders are very much Islamic at core, committed in the name of Allah, and most Muslims know this and remain silent because they either approve of the massacres, or they are too damn scared that if they dare open their mouth to protest or show sympathy for those who were murdered, their own heads will be chopped off. Which makes the calculus about "real Islam" versus "misunderstanders of Islam" fully irrelevant. Because at the end of the day, the only thing that matters is, who has the guns. And right now, the Islamic factions who are committing such barbaric atrocity all around the world have the guns, and rule the YouTubes and Twitter accounts where such things are organized and later justified to the world. They are taking over entire nations, and both local Muslims and immigrant Muslims from all around the world come to join with them in the slaughter, looting and raping.

In fact, the only people who are saying these attacks are NOT "real Islam", are left-wing atheists and apologists for Islamic barbarism, or a few lying mullahs or imams, who have already lied about so much else their credibility is shot.

I should also say, these recent massacres are not exceptionally surprising. And it does not appear that one is at too much greater risk of attracting an Islamic attack by drawing a Muhammed cartoon, or just being a Jew, or a "dirty infidel" who happens to be on the street when a gang of young Muslim toughs decides they want to kill someone. Most of the Islamic murdering is rather random, aimed at Mr. and Mrs. Anybody.

According to the figures at The Religion of Peace website where such atrocity is regularly monitored
the period from December 27 through Jan 2 saw 58 separate Islamic jihad terror attacks, including 7 suicide bomber attacks, which killed 441 people and critically injured another 346. That death toll from the Islamic war against everyone else who is not a Muslim, or who the Brothers of Allah deem is insufficiently Islamic, is an on-going thing over the centuries. So 12 or 13 dead in Paris is shocking and inexcusable, and those figures above don’t include the 2000 who just recently were murdered — but what is really surprising is that people are so shocked about these massacres, and find it to be a big surprise, given all the pro-Islam and Islam-terror support provided by the European governments and mainstream media. (American as well.)

Especially in France, just what are the politicians and police thinking, that they can chronically ignore the on-going violence within their own Muslim communities, who routinely give the middle-finger salute to French culture and democracy, that they give the Muslims their own chunks of French territory to rule under violent Sharia Law… and believe they will not have more serious social explosions in non-Muslim parts of their cities? Just the last couple of weeks have seen a horrific toll of Islamic attacks in France alone, followed by the usual denials that Islam is involved!

France: 1,000 soldiers deployed on streets to combat Christmas jihad terror attacks

900+ Cars Set on Fire to Celebrate New Year’s Eve… but the good news is, that was 12 percent fewer than the 1,067 cars set aflame last year! Progress!

French authorities: No evidence of religious motive or terror behind 3 “Allahu Akbar” automobile smash-into-crowds attacks that have injured dozens.

French Arrest Gunman “Armed to the Teeth” Headed to the Center of Cannes, Troops Deployed

Muslims segregated from French society in growing Islamist mini-states

The sad fact is, all of Europe, and America also — especially every nation laying along the borders of the Saharasian Desert Belt, which also is the territory dominated by the Islamic culture — are suffering incessant Muslim terror attacks, with progressive Islamization, due to direct military attacks, or slow cultural invasion by immigration and demographic expansion. Here are some regional reports from the conservative Gatestone Institute, which highlight the problems as tallied up over ONE YEAR ONLY:

Islamization in France Ongoing at a Fast Pace:

And the situation in the UK is not any better:

Getting worse in Germany as well:

Belgium and Netherlands also, same problems:

This one briefly covers the Islamization of America:

Here’s some proposals on how to stop this deadly process:

The liberal and left-wing politic and mainstream media in Europe and America are in denial about this problem, or they directly support the Muslim terror squads. Right now, fanatical factions of the Muslim communities in Europe have the guns, and their own protected Islam-dominated neighborhoods where they can run and hide with protection and help from others in their communities. These are the Sharia Law "No Go Zones", and they exist across Europe, not only in France:

European ‘No-Go’ Zones for Non-Muslims Proliferating

"Occupation Without Tanks or Soldiers"

Liberals should take special note of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, as it reveals how their apologetics for Islam won’t even buy them the usual agreement with the hungry crocodile, to be eaten last.

On the solution side of things, I will once again recommend the websites organized by Islam-critical scholars and organizations, where the problems are most exactly being researched, documented and exposed. Without knowing the exact dimensions of the problem, effective solutions would be impossible. These websites are run by basically old-fashioned liberal or moderate-conservative people, but are chronically slandered by the left wing as "right-wingers", with all kinds of ugly names, plus death-threats, hacking disruption of their websites, and disruptive Left-Islamic Brownshirt attacks at their public lectures and events.

and for German-speakers,

Most of the above websites have their own email list and daily or weekly postings, a daily or weekly review of which will give you a free education on "Middle East Studies" like nothing offered in the universities. They frequently go into the historical questions, with articles by authentic scholars who aren’t out to apologize for Islamic atrocity, nor afraid to criticize the "Religion of Peace".

As the late Samuel Huntington noted, "Islam has bloody borders, and a bloody interior also." In this, his observation, like that of Churchill in 1899 during the River War, matched exactly my findings in the global cross-cultural study, Saharasia.

Lessons from the past have largely conditioned and predicted our future, well into the 21st Century. The question is, do we recognize this growing Islamic War against the Western democracies, and take up the necessary fighting tools and muscle to end it, preserving our existing Constitutional freedoms? Or do we ignore it, and doom our children and grandchildren to slavery within a new theocratic totalitarianism?

It is an old choice: Freedom or Slavery?

James DeMeo, PhD

Saharasia: The 4000 BCE Origins of Child Abuse, Sex-Repression, Warfare and Social Violence, In the Deserts of the Old World, by J.DeMeo

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
– George Orwell

On Winston Churchill and Islam

January 6, 2015

On Winston Churchill and Islam

A bit of important 20th Century history, and a recent distortion of it.

The Independent recently wrote some historically questionable things about the former Winston Churchill possibly converting to Islam in his younger years.

The article carried a background sentiment that, if Churchill was considering converting to Islam, then it must not be so bad.

The article sanitized things, however, by plastering the journalists’ empty opinions over the central facts being reported, and which do not support the headlines. The Independent article, and most copy-cat iterations of it, also failed to make public the full text of a well-known quote about Islam from Churchill. It is worthwhile to repeat, as it goes against the current trend of PC white-wash about Islamic "peace" and such.

Here is the full quote:

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

Churchill, The River War, 1899, p.248-250.

True in 1899, and prophetic today.

The probable reason for the failure of so many newspapers to provide the full 1899 quote is, that it immediately undercuts claims that Churchill was "obsessed" with Islam in any positive manner, or in danger of conversion, as the articles implied. But also, reciting that full Churchill quote in public can get you arrested in the UK — this Daily Mail article gives the details on that.

"Hate speech" don’t you know? The PC mind-control police re-write history, but arrest you for daring to say in public what runs against their agendas!

Those newspaper-internet articles are a lesson in subtle historical revisionism. They quoted materials from one letter by Churchill’s forthcoming sister-in-law, Lady Bertie, and made up a fantastic headline as if Churchill was in danger of becoming a follower of Muhammed. It was then exaggerated as many members of his family "begging him" to please not convert to Islam. The authors of those articles did not consider (or if so, did not write) that Lady Bertie must have known some accurate things about Islam, which underlay her concerns that the young Winston ought not to convert. She also may have written that letter fully "tongue-in-cheek" as a worrisome joke, given how the young Churchill was at the time known to occasionally put on Arab dress at certain parties hosted by one of his military drinking buddies, where booze and girls were abundant, and many of the young men attending dressed likewise. A kind of swashbuckling "Lawrence of Arabia" thing, and certainly not any kind of serious male-only Koran lessons.

In so doing, the newspapers once again fabricated a controversy where none existed, possibly to help sagging newspaper sales, or as an expression of their never-ending pro-Islam (and anti-UKIP) sentiments. Even Professor Warren Docktor, who brought Lady Bertie’s letter into the public, openly said there was no chance of Churchill converting. And aside from Lady Bertie, it appears, nobody in his family was "begging" him in any manner about Islam. Well, maybe they did ask him to bring home one of those nifty Bedouin head-dresses on the next trip overseas.

The articles also mentioned, as evidence, the fact that Churchill agreed with a proposal to build a mosque in London some thirty years later in 1940, as if the mature Churchill held personal sympathies to Islam. But that claim, which was partly true in small portions — he did approve of funds for such a use — screams for elucidation of historical facts not mentioned in the articles, and which run exactly opposite to the article’s suggested conclusions.

The Muslim world of 1940 was in rapture about Hitler and the Nazis, getting weapons, financial and propaganda support from Germany, to stimulate Islamic revolt against the British Protectorate then overseeing many of the new nations set up by the Treaty of Versailles. The Nazis and Muslims also had a shared hatred of Jews, and Muslims were absolutely delighted with Nazi Germany about that — many still are. "Heil Haidar" was a greeting widespread among Muslims, Hitler being given the Muslim name "Muhammad Haidar", and even "Heil Rommel" became popular as a Muslim greeting in North Africa. The nation of Persia also change its name to "Iran" ("Aryan") around 1935, in part due to fascinations with Nazi supremacist and military influences. Arab nationalist movements, and Baath Socialism were thereby stimulated or amplified and skewed by Nazi meddling. On the European home front, 1940 saw the Nazis defeat the British and French forces in Western Europe, followed by the evacuation at Dunkirk, then the Battle for Britain in the air, and the London blitz. It was an extremely bad time for Britain, before the Luftwaffe was defeated, before the USA got into the fight.

Churchill’s mosque-approval was a part of larger and mostly ineffectual measures taken at those times, calling upon Muslims both in and outside of the British Empire, to fight on their side and not with the Nazis. With few exceptions, Muslim factions in WW2 joined with the Nazis, just as their Islamic Ottoman ancestors joined with the German Kaiser and Austrian Emperor during WW1.

Interesting, the Jews of the region then under the British Protectorate of Palestine organized a Jewish Brigade that fought alongside British General Montgomery. The only Muslim Brigade was the 13th Waffen SS Bosnian Handshars (so named after a kind of butcher knife), who fought on the side of Hitler in the Balkans under the command of the bisexual pedophile and war-criminal Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. Under the Mufti’s command, the Handshars committed massive genocide and war crimes against Christian and Jewish populations across the region.

That was another example of how mullahs serve as simultaneous religious, political and military leaders. Grand Mufti al-Husseini fled Jerusalem when the British were about to arrest him for instigating bloody Muslim Arab riots against the Jews of Palestine in the 1930s, whereupon he fled all the way to Germany. Once in Nazi territory, he got a warm welcome from Hitler, with a budget and operational facility for continued pro-Nazi activities, located in a formerly Jewish-owned chatteau in Vichy France. After the war with old Vichy French help he managed to escape the hangman’s noose by fleeing to Nasser’s Egypt. From there, he was responsible for fanning the flames of Egyptian wars against Jews in Israel, setting up networks for old German SS war criminals to escape into Middle East, where they adopted Muslim names and dress, often converting to Islam. Several became generals in the Egyptian military where they led the 1948 invasions to claim chunks of the newly-created Jewish state of Israel. Those were religious jihad Jewish extermination campaigns, that in the early days quickly over-ran many Jewish settlements, committing massacre and rape, and leaving no survivors. Fortunately, the outnumbered and outgunned Israelis fought like lions, and sent the 6 different Muslim armies fleeing back across their borders to lick their wounds.

The wretched old Mufti continued his dirty work from Egypt, however, having Hitler’s book Mein Kampf translated into various Muslim languages, along with other primary Nazi texts. His primary love-boy disciple in those post-war years was one Yassir Arafat, who continued the cause of Jewish extermination until his death in 2004, helped along the way by both neo-Nazis and political Leftists, who quickly became the new carriers of the virus of Jew-hate. And so they still are, though frequently more cloaked and subtle, and "scholarly", re-writing every little bit of history they could, according to the proven methods of Nazi Gleichschaltung.

The British gesture of building a Grand Mosque in London, with approval from Churchill, was a calculated but ultimately doomed effort to win Muslim "hearts and minds" — Hitler already had conquered that biophysical territory, however, with help from the Murdering Mufti of Jerusalem!

These newspaper "reports" about Churchill and Islam are yet another example of how critical facts on 20th Century history are today being turned upside-down by Leftist Islam-apologists, in ways that if reported in factual context, would be too revealing about the horrors of Islamic sentiments and history. The journalists take a great license by inserting their revisionist opinions into these articles, meanwhile concealing through lies of omission very interesting and centrally-important contrary material, that leads in entirely different directions.

That was a time when the battle lines between freedom and slavery were drawn far more accurately than what we see today, where utopian Communist or Islamic slavery is promoted as freedom, and freedom denigrated as slavery.

James DeMeo

PS. Churchill also said "the lie gets halfway around the world before the truth can even get its trousers on," a sentiment made also several times by Wilhelm Reich with different words, when complaining about how the left-wing press of his day engaged in wholesale slander against his work and person. Though it appears both men probably got their ideas from Mark Twain, who once noted the same, but said "…before the truth can get its boots on".

PPS. Churchill also noted, in honest humor, "You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing — after they have tried everything else." Certainly frequently true, but not just for Americans.


Icon of Evil: Hitler’s Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam
by David G. Dalin and John F. Rothmann

The Nazi Connection to Islamic Terrorism: Adolf Hitler and Haj Amin Al-Husseini
by Chuck Morse

The Mufti of Jerusalem and the Nazis: The Berlin Years
by Klaus Gensicke and Alexander Fraser Gunn