NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data To Erase Global Cooling

NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data To Erase Global Cooling

File this one under "Figures can Lie, but Liars can Figure".

NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data
http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/noaa-fiddles-with-climate-data-to-erase-the-15-year-global-warming-hiatus/

NOAA/NCDC’s new ‘pause-buster’ paper: a laughable attempt to create warming by adjusting past data
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/06/04/noaancdcs-new-pause-buster-paper-a-laughable-attempt-to-create-warming-by-adjusting-past-data/
And NOAA has friends in this process of erasure of authentic data, and creative accounting to manufacture false data. Just consider the work of Mann, et al, who formulated the notorious fraudulent "Hockey Stick" graphic which deliberately erased the Little Ice Age and Medieval Warm Period by use of cherry-picked data. The "hockey stick" was a centerpiece in the fraudulent film An Inconvenient Truth promoted by Al Gore who got a Nobel Peace Prize for it, and today screams how dissenters to his favorite theory ought to be put into prison to shut them up. And there are others in the warming camp of similar unethical bent, using "skeptic club" types of dirty tricks to silence and professionally destroy anyone who dares to challenge the fake "consensus" on CO2-driven global warming. It is a "consensus illusion" only.

The American Physical Society is today caught up in yet another consequence of this academic fakery, of unethical attacks by warmers against anyone daring to challenge their blessed theory. No debate allowed, just throw out and fire anyone who dares to object to the consensus dictatorship.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/06/03/american-physical-society-statement-on-climate-change-no-longer-incontrovertible-but-still-unacceptable/

As to the issue of "certainty" which the warmers claim to own, consider this quote from Feynman:

“The scientist has a lot of experience with ignorance and doubt and uncertainty, and this experience is of very great importance, I think. When a scientist doesn’t know the answer to a problem, he is ignorant. When he has a hunch as to what the result is, he is uncertain. And when he is pretty darned sure of what the result is going to be, he is in some doubt. We have found it of paramount importance that in order to progress we must recognize the ignorance and leave room for doubt. Scientific knowledge is a body of statements of varying degrees of certainty — some most unsure, some nearly sure, none absolutely certain.” Nobel Prize Scientist Richard P. Feynman.

J.D.

"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
– George Orwell

Weekend Seminar on:
Wilhelm Reich’s Original Orgonomic Discoveries:
Foundations and Science
Emphasizing New Research Supporting Reich
http://www.orgonelab.org/events.htm

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: