A Critical Review of CDC USA data on Covid-19

A Critical Review of CDC USA data on Covid-19:

PCR/Antigen Tests & Cases Reveal Herd Immunity Only and Do Not Warrant Public Hysteria or Lockdowns

by James DeMeo, PhD

Full Paper Download:

Latest Update: 23 January 2021

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348550612

https://www.academia.edu/44918309

“What is the hardest thing of all?
That which seems the easiest.
For your eyes to see,
that which lies before your eyes.”
– Goethe

CONTENTS

Abstract

Basic Data on USA Annual Human Mortality

USA Covid-19 and All-Cause Death Counts by Age Group

Covid-19 Death Data Inconsistencies Identified by Genevieve Briand

Seasonality of Covid-19 Data, and the Absence of Lockdown Benefits

Reviewing the “PCR/Antigen Confirmed” USA Covid-19 Data

Analysis of the Death/Case Ratios

Overlap & Possible Dual-Classification or Re-Classification of 2020’s Influenza & Pneumonia into the Covid-19 Category

Electron Microscope Image Errors?

The Fallacy of PCR/Antigen Testing “Accuracy”

Alarmist Reporting on Death Counts

Problems in Medical Diagnosis, & Suppression of Dissent

Banned and Slandered, but Effective Remedies

Changing Definitions of a Disease “Case”

“Evidence-Based Medicine” Often Ignores the Evidence

POSTSCRIPT: 7 January 2021 CDC/NCHS Data Gymnastics in the Last Week of 2020

Conclusions & Recommendations

 

 

Abstract

Basic annual all-cause deaths data, when reviewed in light of a claimed Covid-19 pandemic and decadal expectations from annual increases in population growth, revealed no overall surge in USA deaths for 2020. Age-specific analysis also failed to confirm any significant increase in Covid-19 deaths among populations of high-risk elderly 65+ years as compared to all-cause deaths within the same demographic. The Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) “daily confirmed-case and confirmed-deaths” data on Covid-19 were also reviewed as plotted together on the same ordinate scale, along the vertical axis, revealing a less frightening perspective of daily confirmed death numbers from the claimed “pandemic” than is usually reported on “official science” and media websites with graphical and numerical exaggerations. Daily death/case ratios failed to affirm any significant growth or spread of an expected deadly viral pandemic, except for the initial period of March-April 2020, which quickly subsided. These direct reviews of the official CDC data, formulated within the existing paradigm of a claimed deadly SARS-CoV-2 virus and Covid-19 disease, expose multiple contradictions to basic causality and logic. Problems in PCR/antigen tests and electron-microscopy for specific identification of SARS-CoV-2 are exposed, indicating cross-reactivity and confusions with other corona viruses and their DNA/RNA fragments, along with antibodies to them. The claimed Covid-19 tests thereby do not appear specific to the living SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is why lab-confirmed cases among asymptomatic people have soared to dramatically high numbers, while lab-confirmed deaths have not. Other contradictions in CDC data were identified, and can best be understood as deaths from ordinary seasonal respiratory disorders such as influenza or pneumonia being inappropriately reclassified as Covid-19. Soaring “case” numbers therefore would reflect herd immunity only, possibly as early as May of 2020. These conclusions are not confined to the USA data, but appear global.

Full Paper Download:  https://www.academia.edu/44918309

16 Jan.2021 – © 2021 by author

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: